Dianne: One of the reasons TT&R needed "credibility" was the nay-saying about whether teaching and learning was a topic for scholarly engagement. But people are clamoring for the technological angle.

Paul: There is a great interst for this. We sent out more single issues of TT&R 5/1 than any other issue. But what about connecting with peer reviewers? What about editorial board? Who will eidt these particular pieces? It would be work.

Mary agrees--it would be work, without an immediate incentive. But I'm hungry for a level of conversationon these issues. I want to support that on some level. These technologies make it possible to conduct this world-wide conversation. Can we show up here next year with a collection of articles, and so on?